International Court of Justice and Palestinian-Israeli "peace negotiations"
Whenever you hear about
Palestinian-Israeli “peace talks/peace negotiations”, remember the following
lines.
In the North Sea
Continental Shelf Case[i], the
International Court of Justice ruled that there is an obligation on States to
enter “... into
negotiations with a view to arriving at an agreement… they are under an
obligation so to conduct themselves that the negotiations are meaningful,
which will not be the case when either of them insists upon its own position
without contemplating any modification of it…”
Therefore, the ICJ in this Case
set out the scope and extent of the obligation to negotiate.
Now: are the Palestinian-Israeli
negotiations truly engaged into “with a view to arriving at an agreement”? Are
they “meaningful”?
How many pre-conditions to
reaching “peace” has Israel imposed? And has Israel stopped creating
irreversible facts on the ground?
[i] North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of
Germany/Netherlands), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1969, p. 3.
Comments
Post a Comment